From:      owner-rq-rules-digest
To:        rq-rules-digest@hops.wharton.upenn.edu
Subject:   RQ Rules Digest: V1 #10
Reply-To:  rq-rules
Errors-To: owner-rq-rules-digest
Precedence: bulk
Content-Return: Prohibited
Return-Path: owner-rq-rules-digest


RQ Rules Digest:          Friday, 11 November 1994      Volume 01 : Number 010


RULES OF THE ROAD

1. Do not include large sections of a message in your reply. Especially
   not to say "Yeah, I agree."  Those who do will be lynched.
2. Use an appropriate Subject line. RQR: will be prepended to it.
3. Do not engage in a point-by-point analysis or rebuttal of another
   person's message.  It is too confusing for others to follow,
   qualifies as nit-picking, and it usually leads to flame wars.
4. There is no number 4.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RQR: mail archives
RQR: Shamens: - A correction: (and apologies)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Loren Miller <loren@hops.wharton.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 1994 16:26:10 -0500 (EST)
Subject: RQR: mail archives

Hello All,

The digests of the rq-rules discussion are now available by return
e-mail.  Actually, they have been since day 1 of the rq-rules-digest
but I hesitated to announce them until everything else was working.
You can retrieve a list of the digests by sending mail to
majordomo@hops.wharton.upenn.edu with "index rq-rules-digest" in the
body of the message.  The issues will be listed out for you in a
return message.  To retrieve an issue of the digest, or any other file
which might be in the directory, send a message to the same location
with "get rq-rules-digest <filename>" in the message body.  Replace
<filename> with the real name of the file.

- -- 
Loren Miller       <loren@hops.wharton.upenn.edu>
I can tell by your shoes that you are a lover of liberty

------------------------------

From: rollin@EQL12.Caltech.Edu
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 94 16:03:29 PST
Subject: RQR: Shamens: - A correction: (and apologies)

Firstly, when I mentioned "three major magic types", I was refering to the
RQ3 triad of Sorcerors, Shamans and Priests. (Not that someone couldn't or
shouldn't come up with others.)

I also, typing w/o thinking refered to Shamans teaching a spell, which of
course they don't.  "Procuring a spell spirit for"  would be a
better phraseology.

Mia apologia.

------------------------------

End of RQ Rules Digest: V1 #10
******************************


This is the bottom of the RuneQuest Rules Digest.  RuneQuest is a
trademark of Avalon Hill, and Glorantha is a trademark of Chaosium.
With the exception of previously copyrighted material, unless
specified otherwise all text in this digest is copyright by the author
or authors, with rights granted to copy for personal use, to excerpt
in reviews and replies, and to archive unchanged for electronic
retrieval.

Send electronic mail to Majordomo@hops.wharton.upenn.edu with "help"
in the body of the message for subscription information on this and
other mailing lists.